Why Organizational Intelligence, and why now?
After twenty-five years across different industries, I keep returning to a question: why do familiar organizational problems survive so many serious efforts to solve them?
Thinking
Por Enrique Guzmán, fundador de CERNYVA.
After twenty-five years across different industries, I keep returning to a question: why do familiar organizational problems survive so many serious efforts to solve them?
A meeting ends five minutes early because everyone agrees. Two weeks later, each person has done something different. On the words organizations fill with different meanings.
A mechanic, a diagnostic that is right, and a fault that comes back. What AI changes in organizations, and what it leaves to them.
A company solves a difficult problem. Two years later, somewhere else in the same organization, remarkably similar conversations begin again.
We have become very good at measuring what AI can save. What did the people it replaces know that the organization still needs to know?
Organizations have become extraordinarily good at preserving the past. What they seem much less reliable at doing is ensuring that the past changes the future.
An organization can have good data and still disagree about what happened. The whole can behave less intelligently than its parts.
If every enterprise system is designed to preserve what already happened, what is actually responsible for helping an organization make better decisions tomorrow?
Most data problems I have seen were not really about data. They were about accountability: who owns it, who decides, who is responsible when things go wrong.